The Face Watch Series

ODI Start Time, Tri- Series Opening Match. The Bangladesh national cricket team will fight to boost their world ICC One Day International ranking just three weeks ahead of the prestigious Champions Trophy tournament, when they face host Ireland in the opener of an ODI tri- nation series. The match will live stream on Friday with the Tigers needing a pair of wins over Ireland, and at least one win in two matches against New Zealand to vault from seventh to six place on the ICC table. While Ireland is still developing as an international cricket side, and still awaits Test status, Bangladesh have proven themselves more than able to compete with many of the world’s top teams in the ODI format, and will look to improve on their split of two games in Sri Lanka — with a third as a no- result — in April. To find out how to watch a live stream in several countries of the first ODI of the tri- series, Ireland vs. Bangladesh, see the streaming information at the bottom of this article. Start time for the 5.

The Stupendous Wave 2,800,409 views. Watch free TV shows online,www.ustv.cc offers more than 450 shows online streaming.

British Summer Time at Stormont Cricket Ground in Belfast, Northern Ireland, on Friday, May 1. In Bangladesh the live stream will get underway at 3: 4. New Zealand hoping to get a look at the Black Caps’ two opponents in the tri- series will need to log in to the live stream at 9: 4. The match begins at 5: 4. Eastern Daylight Time, 2: 4. Pacific. Watch Bangladesh Captain Mashrafe Mortaza offer his thoughts on the match against Ireland and the entire tri- series in the video below. Ireland are coming off their historic first- ever series on English soil, where they played two ODI matches against their hosts — including the Lord’s debut for the Irish in the second match.

But while Ireland showed flashes of improvement, the results were far from what they hoped for, taking a pair of drubbings from the far more seasoned England squad. Here are the expected teams for Friday’s Ireland vs. Bangladesh first ODI. Note that Bangladesh skipper, Mashrafe, must serve a one- match suspension due to a slow over rate in the final match against Sri Lanka, and will give way to Test Captain Mushfiqur Rahim for the first ODI.

Ireland: 1 Ed Joyce, 2 Paul Stirling, 3 William Porterfield (captain), 4 Andy Balbirnie, 5 Niall O’Brien (wicketkeeper), 6 Gary Wilson, 7 Kevin O’Brien, 8 George Dockrell, 9 Barry Mc. Carthy, 1. 0 Tim Murtagh, 1. Peter Chase. Bangladesh: 1 Tamim Iqbal, 2 Soumya Sarkar, 3 Sabbir Rahman, 4 Shakib Al Hasan (captain), 5 Mosaddek Hossain, 6 Mushfiqur Rahim (wicketkeeper), 7 Mahmudullah, 8 Mehedi Hasan, 9 Shafiul Islam, 1. Taskin Ahmed, 1. 1 Mustafizur Rahman.

Becoming Human: Series Overview. Unearthing our earliest ancestors Airing August 31, 2011 at 9 pm on PBS Aired August 31, 2011 on PBS. The home of great entertainment. Our weekly guide to what’s on is full of exclusive interviews and news on the latest shows. Watch a live stream of the first ODI cricket match of the Ireland Tri-Series, with the host country facing Bangladesh on Friday, with New Zealand up next, as the. Funny videos, fail videos, funny pictures, funny galleries, funny links, flash games, jokes, caption contests, photoshop contests. Naruto Shippuden 499: Hidden Leaf Story, the Perfect Day for a Wedding, Part 6: The Outcome of the Secret Mission.

Watch the 1st ODI Stream in Bangladesh. Gazi TV will live stream the first and final Sri Lanka vs. Bangladesh ODI cricket match of the three- match series at this link, but be aware, the live stream will be available to view in Bangladesh only. Watch a Live Stream in New Zealand. Sky Sports in New Zealand also carries all six matches in the New Zealand, Bangladesh, and Ireland tri- series, including the first ODI between Bangladesh and host Ireland.

The Face Watch Series Eu

Subscribers can access a live stream on the Sky Go NZ service at this link. Live Stream the ODI Cricket Match in Ireland. The Ireland vs. Bangladesh first T2.

Sport, which means that to access a live stream, fans in Ireland must register for the eir Vision Go streaming service at this link to obtain an eir Vision Go login. Cricket Fans in the U. S. Can Watch a Live Stream Free. In the United States, live stream coverage of the entire Bangladesh, New Zealand, Ireland cricket tri- series will be carried by ESPN3, the online- only channel in the ESPN Network, at this link. The ESPN3 streaming channel is free to subscribers of most major internet service providers and many minor ISPs, as well.

For a full list, check this link. To watch the Ireland vs. Bangladesh first 1st ODI match on mobile devices, download the Watch.

The ultimate runner’s review of Apple Watch Series 2. With the launch of a GPS watch, and a renewed Nike partnership, Apple is getting serious about targeting runners. So is Apple Watch Series 2 the perfect running partner that Cupertino promises? As an avid runner myself, I was keen to find out.

Over the past couple of months, I’ve been training for the TCS New York City Marathon, and I took my Apple Watch Series 2 with me every step of the way — right up to the finish line in Central Park last week. Here’s how it measured up. How I tested Apple Watch Series 2. Unlike most running watches, Apple Watch Series 2 does not just rely on its built- in GPS to follow your running route. It can also get assistance from your i. Phone’s GPS. This helps save battery and boost accuracy. But the whole advantage of having built- in GPS is that you should be able to leave your i.

Phone behind when you go for a run. So in all my testing for this review, I ensured that my i. Phone was out of range. Apple offers two main variants of its Series 2 watch: standard and Nike- branded models. I bought and tested both, but found no significant difference between them in terms of features and accuracy. I used Apple’s Workout app in most of my testing, but I also tried out the Nike Run Club app that is included with the Nike model.

The running watch of my dreams. My fondness for Nike+ Running goes back a long way. The first GPS running watch I ever owned was the Nike Sport. Watch GPS, which I reviewed for Cult of Mac back in 2. I knew I wanted a Nike Apple Watch long before it was even announced.

Last year I wrote an article with mockups suggesting that Apple should release an “Apple Watch Nike Edition” featuring built- in GPS, Nike- designed bands, custom watch faces and the Nike+ app built in. And that is exactly what Cupertino has done. So to say that I was predisposed to like the new watch is an understatement. Running watches are not known for their sartorial elegance. But the combination of Nike and Apple styling makes this the best- looking wearable I’ve ever seen. It looks so good, in fact, that I have taken to wearing it most of the time, saving my fancier steel link bracelet model for special occasions.

I can’t think of any other running watch I’d be happy to wear all the time like that. Watch The Fight Within Youtube. The only minor gripe I have about the design is the color. Nike calls it’s trademark fluorescent greeny- yellow “Volt.” This color is used on the watch face and the strap. In daylight, the colors match perfectly. But in artificial light, the screen appears green while the strap looks yellow, which creates an ugly color- clash.

Maybe a future model could use Apple’s True Tone technology from i. Pad Pro to match the color of the display to the lighting environment. In artificial light, the Volt color of the display does not match the strap. Photo: Graham Bower/Cult of Mac. But there is more to a great running watch than its looks. If you are serious about your running, then you want to be sure that your watch is tracking all your hard work accurately.

Time to take my Apple Watch for a run. After taking my new Apple Watch Series 2 for a few runs, I soon realized that it was giving me significantly different distance estimates than I get from my trusty Tom. Tom Runner 2. I was not entirely surprised by this, because I had read Engadget’s Apple Watch review, which reported that distance and pace estimates varied from the reviewer’s Garmin.

The trouble with this kind of comparison is that you can’t be sure which watch is right. Maybe Engadget’s Garmin and my Tom. Tom were always off the mark, and Apple Watch is in fact more accurate.

The gold- standard test for running watch accuracy. I decided to get scientific and subject both watches to a more objective test. So I went to my local running track, where distances are measured out precisely. A standard running track is 4. To test the watches, I performed six separate 1 kilometer runs, wearing my Apple Watch Series 2 on one wrist and my Tom. Tom on the other.

For each run, I started a new workout on both watches at the start line, and ended it at the finish line. The results surprised me. Apple Watch turned out to be more accurate on all six tests. By how much? To answer that, we’ll need to get a little geeky. The results table below shows the distances recorded by both watches and the variance from the actual distance (1 kilometer).

The data show a standard error of 3. Apple Watch versus a whopping 6. Tom. Tom, (given a normal distribution at 9.

In other words, Apple Watch was almost twice as accurate. Results from 6x 1- kilometer running track tests. Photo: Graham Bower/Cult of Mac. Distances are accurate, but route mapping is not. While Apple Watch’s distance estimates were impressively accurate in my test, a different picture emerged when I looked at its route mapping.

As you can see below, Tom. Tom’s map follows the track closely, whereas Apple’s looks more like a random scribble. Apple Watch Series 2 can’t keep up with Tom. Tom when route mapping the running track. Photo: Graham Bower/Cult of Mac.

It is odd that Apple Watch distance estimates can be so precise when its route mapping is so sketchy — it seems the mapping software is excessively simplifying the GPS data. Take this example of a road crossing: While the Tom. Tom shows where and how I crossed the road in a lot of detail, Apple Watch smooths it out into a simple straight line.

How did the chicken cross the road? Apple Watch and Tom. Tom mapping compared.

Photo: Graham Bower/Cult of Mac. Throughout my marathon training, Apple’s route mapping tended to oversimplify, meander off track, randomly pass through city blocks and even drift into rivers. Tom. Tom’s route maps were consistently more reliable. Location, location, location.

Location appears to have a big impact. I did training runs in four different cities: Barcelona, Stockholm, London and New York. The city of Stockholm is built on an archipelago, with lots of islands separated by plenty of open space, while my running route in Barcelona takes me mostly along the beachfront. In both cases, Apple Watch’s mapping was fairly reliable. But London and New York are larger, more built- up cities with lots of tall buildings.

Here, Apple Watch’s mapping became far less reliable. For example, in midtown Manhattan, surrounded by skyscrapers, I found that large chunks of my run were simply not mapped at all. This is known as “urban canyon” interference — and it affects all GPS devices.

But my Tom. Tom handled these conditions better, providing reasonably accurate mapping where my Apple Watch did not. Running through Manhattan’s concrete canyons. Photo: Graham Bower/Cult of Mac. Does mapping accuracy affect distance estimates? For most runners, route maps are just a fun reminder of past runs, and their accuracy is not that important. It’s the distance, time and pace metrics that really count. Most of the mapping glitches I’m describing are only noticeable if you zoom into the map and take a close look, so they are arguably not that important.

But I was concerned that they may be impacting Apple’s Watch’s distance estimates. My running track test had shown that Apple Watch was highly accurate at distance estimates despite its poor route mapping.

But what about in more typical running routes that take you through city streets with intermittent GPS reception? Without the precision of the running track, it is hard to know for sure how long your running route is. So instead, I looked at the consistency of my watches’ distance estimates when I completed multiple runs following exactly the same route.

The same route should result in the same estimate. Any variance in distance is therefore an indication of inaccuracy. I used three different routes for this test — one in Barcelona, one in Stockholm and one in London. The table below shows the distance estimates I got from my Apple Watch and Tom.

Tom. Testing the consistency of Apple Watch’s distance estimates on the same route. Photo: Graham Bower/Cult of Mac.